Skip to content

Maharashtra auction sees tariffs hit Rs 2.74 per unit

Share

Unlike Gujarat’s 700 MW tender, Maharashtra’s 1 GW tender saw mostly domestic developers participating.

Shiv Solar and Acme Solar won 50MW and 300MW, respectively, at the lowest winning tariff of Rs 2.74 per unit, while ReNew Power and Avaada Energy won 300MW and 350MW at Rs 2.75 per unit.

“Lower tariffs were in any case not justified as all kinds of costs are going up…. Prices should rise, but the moment they do, states have been cancelling the auction itself. So developers have stayed close to the old price,” a developer was quoted as saying by Economic Times in a report on the auction results.

Maharashtra’s previous solar auction in May last year had seen winning tariffs of Rs 2.71-2.72 per unit.

For the latest 1 GW tender, the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) had initially set a ceiling of Rs 2.8 per unit.The projects are not location-specific, which means developers can set up solar projects anywhere in the country—not necessarily in Maharashtra, which has lower solar radiation than states like Rajasthan. This flexibility is said to have driven lower tariffs in the auction.

In contrast, Gujarat’s 700 MW auction had seen developers attributing the rise in tariffs (Rs 2.84) to high charges levied at the state’s Raghanesda Solar Park, where the 700 MW of projects were to have been located. The entire tendered capacity was ‘won’ by foreign companies, although it proved a short-lived success as the auction was cancelled blaming high tariffs.

Maharashtra has 1.1 GW of installed solar projects and 350 MW in the pipeline. It has set a target of 7.5 GW of solar power generation capacity this year.

Of 1,095 MW of rooftop solar capacity in India, Maharashtra leads the way with 145.09 MW, according to data from the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy.

 

 

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Share

Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.

This website uses cookies to anonymously count visitor numbers. To find out more, please see our Data Protection Policy.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close