The Hydrogen Stream: Hydrogen grid could cut Europe’s energy costs by 3.4%
German researchers say gas-grid retrofits for hydrogen transport, combined with power grid expansion, could decarbonize Europe’s economy, while S&P says the global ammonia trade could expand by nearly 10 times by 2050.
Image: Technische Universität Berlin, Joule, Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0
Share
Technische Universität Berlin researchers say a hydrogen network connecting regions with low-cost renewable potential to demand centers, electrofuel production, and cavern storage sites in Europe could reduce system costs by up to €26 billion ($29.2 billion) a year. “The presence of a new hydrogen network can reduce system costs by up to 3.4%,” wrote the researchers. They say that between 64% and 69% of the hydrogen network could reuse gas pipelines and that expanding both the hydrogen network and the power grid would help meet net-zero emission targets, cutting costs by 9.9%, or €72 billion per year.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
I wonder as well why repurposing an unwanted pipeline would lead to any benefit?
From the report in Science Direct:
” Since Europe’s sizable natural GAS TRANSMISSION network is set to become increasingly REDUNDANT as the system transitions toward climate neutrality, the option to repurpose parts of the network to transport hydrogen instead may enhance the appeal of hydrogen networks further. ”
Gas transmission is becoming redundant.
So why would a refitted/renovated gas transmission save 3.4% of system costs ??
Spending money on something that is redundant is absurd.
I think PV magazine should ask some serious questions to TU Berlin.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
I wonder as well why repurposing an unwanted pipeline would lead to any benefit?
From the report in Science Direct:
” Since Europe’s sizable natural GAS TRANSMISSION network is set to become increasingly REDUNDANT as the system transitions toward climate neutrality, the option to repurpose parts of the network to transport hydrogen instead may enhance the appeal of hydrogen networks further. ”
Gas transmission is becoming redundant.
So why would a refitted/renovated gas transmission save 3.4% of system costs ??
Spending money on something that is redundant is absurd.
I think PV magazine should ask some serious questions to TU Berlin.